Range Report: Bersa Series 95 (Nickled)
Hello. A while back, a fellow wanted to sell a Bersa
Series 95 that he had purchased new and had fired but 200 factory rounds
through. It would come with one extra magazine at what I thought was a fair
price.
The pistol was as described and he tossed in a box of Fiocchi 90-gr. JHP
ammunition.
This is the pistol and ammunition perchased. The gun came with an extra
magazine. Based only on visual examination, that Fiocchi JHP ammunition sure
looks like the bullet is Hornady's (excellent) XTP, but I've not checked that
assumption for accuracy...yet.
Series 95 vs. Thunder: The guns are quite similar including both
magazines, grips and grip screws. Most obvious is the Series 95's lack of a
hooked trigger guard, something I prefer, and the lack of verticle grooves on
both the front and rear grip straps. The entired Series 95 appears to be
electroless nickled where my Thunder has the dark finished slide and small
parts. Sights appear the same on both. The rib atop the Series 95 has horizontal
striations only, unlike the fine knurling on the Thunder's rib. Trigger pulls on
both pistols were equivalent and both have the magazine disconnect. Both guns
"felt" the same except for the lack of vertical grooves on the Series 95. The
magazine floorplate is slightly different than that of the Thunder's magazines,
though my extra magazine's appeared to be identical.
I figured that there wouldn't be much if any difference in shooting between the
Series 95 pistol and the Thunder.
Shooting: Shooting was done at varying distances not only to check
accuracy but handling potential. The latter will always have some degree of
subjectivity present as what feels "right" to one person, might not to another.
Most shots were fired from a standing position using a two-hand hold. A few
groups were fired seated with braced wrists.
Eight shots of the Fiocchi 90-gr. JHP grouped nicely in this off-hand group
at ten yards. Each of these shots was fired from the single-action mode and in
slow-fire.
Federal's 90-gr. "Classic" JHP grouped very nicely from the pistol. This
15-yard group was fired from a seated position and in slow-fire with my wrists
braced.
Each shot in this group was fired double-action. I simply decocked between
shots. They were fired from a standing position with a two-hand hold. Not
slow-fire but fired at a fairly rapid cadence when a "flash sight picture" was
obtained.
Fired from a standing position and using a two-hand hold, five sets of
controlled pairs were fired. The first shot was fired double-action with the
follow-up in single-action. Starting from a low ready position, average time was
1.41 seconds, quickest being a couple of hundreths less with the longest being
about 1.7 seconds. I have little doubt that others can certainly do better, but
I think this is fairly representative of my limited abilities with the little
shooter. Ammunition used was Georgia Arms' 95-gr. FMJ sold under their "canned
heat" label.
I finished up with a 15-yard group fired off-hand and standing with a
two-hand hold with some older Federal 90-gr. HydraShoks I happened to have.
The pistol was fired with the following ammunition:
50 rounds of Federal 90-gr. JHP
40 rounds of Federal 90-gr. HydraShok
50 rounds of Remington UMC 95-gr. FMJ
150 rounds of Georgia Arms 95-gr. FMJ
25 rounds of Fiocchi 90-gr. JHP
Observations: When cycling the slide by hand to chamber rounds, all of
the ammunition listed above fed smoothly. Ejection was positive and primer
strikes were nicely centered and plenty deep for reliable ignition.
I had expected flawless function as has consistently been the case with my Bersa
Thunder.
I did not get it. There were numerous failures to feed (always the last
shot) and frequently the slide did not remain locked back after the last round
was fired as it should.
Sadly, this was frequently the case when the gun tried to chamber the last
round in the magazine.
Interestingly, neither of these malfunctions occurred with the Fiocchi JHP.
I began to compare some of the ammunition.
On the left is Remington UMC 95-gr. FMJ having a LOA of 0.975". On the right
is GA's version at a shorter 0.940".
Shown here is Federal's 90-gr. JHP, which had the shortest LOA, measuring
0.927".
I figured that this little gun simply preferred ammunition within a tight range
of lengths overall.
Wrong! I am embarrassed to admit that I did not note the culprit until
cleaning the Series 95 that evening.
The top magazine is the extra that came with the gun. While it resembles the
Bersa factory magazine shown below, it is not and has been relegated to "File
13". Note that the factory magazine has printing visible on it and that the
aftermarket doesn't. The non-factory magazine in this case also had a
dark-colored follower. I tried the gun with this factory magazine and two other
extra Bersa magazines I had at hand and as with the nickled magazine that came
with the pistol, function was now 100%.
Excepting the poor performance from the aftermarket magazine, shooting results
and reliability in the extreme were about as expected. I have heard/read that
some folks consider the Bersa .380's to be "junk pistols". I do not. I have had
and continue to have very good luck with the one I've owned for several years
now and expect to do the same with the Series 95.
(Please note that I am not recommending the Bersa .380's for
self-protection, but neither am I condemning it. That decision is one for
the individual. While I personally prefer a little "more" than what the .380
delivers ballistically, I really do like several makes and models of pistols
chambered in this caliber and I have to admit that these little dumplings are
almighty easy to have at hand, something that is not nearly so easily said with
some more potent (and larger) handguns.)
As has been the case with my Bersa Thunder (and quite a few I've seen shot at
various CHL qualifications), this pistol is proving itself reliable in the
extreme, an essential characteristic for any firearm intended for
self-protection.
POA closed matched POI at the distances I shot the gun and I made zero
horizontal changes to the rear sight; it remains centered.
I will be hanging on to this little popper just like my Thunder. I have couple
of other more pricey 380's lying about and I enjoy shooting them to be sure, but
I enjoy the Bersa's just as much. Rarely, I'll find myself toting a .380 ACP
pistol, either as a backup or by itself when nothing more can be had. In the
past, it somehow always wound up being the little Thunder.
Now it will be either the Bersa Thunder or the Series 95. I really like
both pistols.
Best.