Colt Enhanced Stainless Combat
Commander
Complete Product Or “Kit” Gun?
By David Tong
By now, there isn’t anyone who doesn’t know that I am an
ardent admirer of the 1911 pattern pistol. Having over 35 years’ experience with
"Old Slabsides", as a pistolsmithing apprentice, sometime practical pistol
competitor, and lately legal concealed permit holder, I still believe it to be
the best and most versatile service automatic out there.
That said, back in the 1970s when first working on them professionally, the
Series 70 and older Colts were about the only ballgame in town, and generally
they had a host of issues to contend with. These included poor fitting of
slide/frame/barrel, stiff and creepy trigger pulls, sloppy machining, poor
sights, and so forth. Jim Hoag, one of the original Jeff Cooper associates in
the Souhwest Pistol League, did land office business correcting all the problems
and making them truly accurate and reliable.
It was with some interest that I was able to shoot a near-current Series 80
steel Commander model. For those unfamiliar, it is the latest development of the
pistol originally introduced in 1949 by Colt as a “Lightweight” Commander with
an aluminum alloy frame and a 4.25”, rather than the Government Model and GI
standard 5” barrel.
The use of the steel frame increases the weight from the Lightweight’s
26 oz. to 33 oz. All still use the full size butt section and magazines, and the
pistol came with a “Colt” marked 8 rounder….more on that later.
I had recently submitted an article named, “Wither Colt?,” which detailed some
of the issues facing the grand old company, mostly the normal Northeastern
hostility toward gunmaking, as well as prohibitive labor costs.
While I am not sure when the test pistol was manufactured, it did have roll
markings on the slide and frame except for the serial number, which was
laser-engraved; thus I surmise it must have been relatively recent.
The Enhanced model means that there were several mostly stylistic changes to
this 1911, including angled “Gold Cup” style cocking serrations; a raised (but
non-serrated) slide rib; a wide grip safety tang to prevent hammer bite; a
(unfortunately plastic) flat mainspring housing; a (unfortunately plastic) long
trigger; sub-contracted/rubberized nylon finger grooved stocks that replaced
walnut on originals; and the usual modern three white dots for sights.
Some of these features are due to market demand. Most makers of 1911s these days
fit their pistols with long triggers and flat housings, which drives this writer
nuts as he prefers his pistols the other way around. In addition, the thumb
safety lever is the postwar “A1” style, small and non-extended; to my knowledge,
Colt has never fitted so-called “speed” safeties to their pistols, ostensibly
for fear of liability issues arising from people actually carrying their pistols
Condition One, e.g., cocked and locked.
The slide-to-frame fit was indeed better than the old days, as was the
barrel and bushing fit. The slide was centered on the frame, the locking lug
recesses in the slide were cut to a uniform radius and depth, the breech face
was smooth, and the extractor tension appeared to be set properly.
What was less apparent was a lackadaisical approach to fit and finish overall.
While the aluminum oxide grit blasting of all the non flat surfaces and the
polish of the flats was well-executed, all the edges on the front and rear areas
of the slide and frame were left SHARP. No attempt was made to break those edges
to be kinder to both hands and holsters.
One of the best features of a proper 1911 is the trigger system. If properly
fitted, as Smith & Wesson and Springfield 1911s are, the sear release is akin to
a late model bolt action rifle compared to its pistol brethren, generally under
5lbs, with minimal take-up, overtravel, and no creep. Well, this one must have
escaped QC, because the pull was abominable, probably 7.5 lbs. with a hard
“tick” each and every time the trigger was pressed. Both slow and rapid fire
were tough to do.
I’ll grant you that the two trigger-activated, frame-mounted levers, and
slide-mounted spring loaded plunger of the Series 80 does make it somewhat more
difficult to provide a decent trigger, but this one was one of the worst
examples I’ve handled.
The grip safety too came under scrutiny. In the bad old days, we’d
occasionally see a grip safety whose depressed surface sat BELOW that of the
frame tangs to either side, and needless to say, this feels like a butter knife
when you grasp the pistol; worse after shooting some number of rounds. Wouldn’t
break skin, but not exactly comfortable.
The “beveled magazine well” was also not done well. The angle in which
it was (probably) single-pass plunge cut was at too shallow an angle, rendering
the attempt not really any better than no bevel at all to enable fast magazine
changes on reloads. In addition, the front strap of the frame’s thickness at the
bottom was thinned to the point that checkering of the frame was no longer
possible as there wasn’t enough meat on it to avoid perforating the frame.
The firing pin stop (the sliding metal plate which retains the firing pin and
extractor) has a small “1” stamped onto it. This means that it was one of the
slides whose cut was oversized and Colt then had to produce oversized
parts to fit it.
Finally, this Colt showed that it was manufactured with the use of subcontracted
or outsourced components. Now it is common knowledge that a company named
Metalform has been making “Colt” magazines for years. While other companies
advertise 100% in house manufacture of their pistols, I do not believe that the
proper use of outside firms to supply well-proven parts is a big deal, viewing
their use as more of a true enhancement.
The magazine had one of the Chip McCormick spring-loaded followers that provided
the room for the eighth round, compared to the usual seven. I’ve used the
McCormick magazines now for over ten years, and aside from the occasional change
of springs, they have proven reliable in my pistols.
Indeed, the pistol worked with all loads and magazines tried, including the
“factory” 8 rounder, McCormick’s, and Novak’s. What wasn’t as pleasant was
wrestling with that trigger, particularly in rapid-fire “hammers” drills when
one aims the first shot and triggers the second without a second sight picture.
Shots ended up going rather low for me, some 4-5” below point of initial aim on
the second shot.
This was the first time I’d ever fired a steel Commander, and it differed from
the Government in that it was a bit faster to swing from target to target, and
slide cycle time was a bit snappier.
Muzzle rise was also somewhat reduced due to less slide mass on recoil.
I’d like to conclude that this pistol does rather remind me of the old days in
terms of the amount of remedial work that one would probably have to do if one
wanted to actually shoot it much, as opposed to leaving it in a nightstand
drawer or showing it to one’s friends.
I wanted to love it, but at the end of the day, I just couldn’t.